Why Single Out Gosnell?

Dr__Kermit_Gosnell_620x350For the past month and half, notorious late term abortionist Kermit Gosnell has been on trial for murder, due to the filthy conditions of his abortion business and the horrific manor in which he conducts his practice.  Pro-life columnist Kristen Walker Hatten makes a compelling case that Gosnell should be aquitted (Yes, you read that right), and I agree with her:

Let him go. You know what, drop the charges. If I were the prosecuting attorney I’d say, “We thought about it, and we decided, y’know, if it’s legal over here, then why not let it be legal over there? If it’s legal at 24.5 weeks, then what the hell is the difference at 25 weeks? Or 33 weeks? Or a couple days after birth?”

Maybe by putting a murderer back on the street we can make our point that there already are murderers walking the streets, legally. They’re called all the abortionists.

The pro-aborts have been condemning Gosnell’s practice at an attempt to do PR damage control.  That’s an attempt to whitewash the practice itself and to cover up the fact that Gosnell’s practice is not an isolated case.  Why let them have that way out?

Thanks to Live Action‘s investigative project, “Inhuman” – Undercover in America’s Late-Term Abortion Industry” which blows the lid off of that secret, we can no longer pretend otherwise.  They’ve so far, released three seperate videos from their investigation, from three different cities, and if the history of their previous investigative projects tell us anything, we can count on more to come.  Point being, this is far from an isolated case.

But aside from the horid conditions of these practices, and even the late stage of development of the children in the fetal stage whose lives are brutally taken, or the fact that late term abortionists will allow a baby who is “accidentally” born alive despite the intent to abort him/her,  why single out Gosnell?  Why single out those caught on tape by the Live Action team?  As Kristen writes:

Do we condemn Kermit Gosnell for committing abortions in a filthy, slovenly, contaminated manner? If we do, are we saying it’s okay to kill babies if you use clean instruments and don’t accidentally perforate the uterus? Is it okay to abort lots of black babies if you’re just as nice to the black mothers as you are to the white? Is it okay to kill children as long as they’re not a certain size or a certain age?

Either all abortionists should be up on murder trial or none at all.  I know that sounds harsh, but we’re talking about the direct murder of innocent human lives here.

________________________________________________________

Thus far, here are the Live Action videos released as part of the “Inhuman” project.

New York:

Washington D.C.:

Arizona:

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Why Single Out Gosnell?

  1. Pingback: THE ABOLITIONIST: Acceptable Steps | Life of the Party

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s